Bob added the following comment, that I want to elevate because you'll find it helpful:
Ron and I would love to hear your opinions, positive or negative. Please feel free to contact us at either cummings_robert1@colstate.edu and/or rlbaltha@uga.edu.
Nick's raw notes on Bob's and Ron's presentation
Bob: Evaluating Levels of Cognitive Thought
Context: Spellings leveraging NCLB like practices to go after colleges via calls for accountability assessment.
quote from "No Gr_du_ate Left Behind," James Traub, NYT Magazine, 9/30/07
Purpose is to demonstrate learning outcomes for a field. Administrators go to these tests because they need to meet the purpose test claim to meet. Need to show to some constituent that learning is happening.
Meanwhile, the University System of Georgia is considering moving to outcomes rather than credit hours as way to measure achievement. If outcomes based testing is coming, then it's worth keeping this idea in mind:
"If the proverbial gun is being pointed at our collective heads, how can we improve our current assessment systems to meet these demands without shooting ourselves first?"
What teachers don't want:
Bubble sheet exams to measure outcomes which attempt to nationally normed.
Machine readers for student writing. (Computers are fast, efficient and dumb)
Or human readers in Bangalore (Shorthand for doesn't want to outsource assessment.)
Exams which are external to our curriculm.
Assessment which determines our curriculum.
What teachers want:
assessment that allows us to teach to our strengths and caps on passions to determine curriculm
FYC Directors want:
to see who is learning to write better according to disciplinary measures and consistent w/ values
assessment that helps teachers strengthen their pedagogy.
U. Administrators want
assessment that is quantitative; is independently verified; broad enough to allow comparisons across system institutions so every institution is a winner in some way.
We have to have some type quanitative element to assessment because of ETS/College Board precedents.
One idea is to use an Outcomes Based E-portfolio Assessment
At UGA eportfolio requires reflection, two revised essay, bio w/ image, peer review, and so on
End of semester eportfolio is capstone and must be substantial part of course
Reflective intro would be on board of regents first year composition outcomes, describing how writing artifacts from course satisified those outcomes.
Student reflective essay connects course artifacts in portfolio to the BOR outcomes
Persuade the reader the artifacts meet the outcomes.
Instructor of record using wholistic rubric to assess the outcomes reflective essay.
Same essay also read by another FYC comp instructor in USG system and scores reflective essay w/ same rubric as instructor of record.
What would this do?
- Have departmental discussion about what works
- Increase student transference, or know what they learned sooner, and are able to appy it only courses.
- Student, teachers, depts have artifacts to share w/ external stakeholders: parents, employers.
Students
What if I don't want to switch to portfolios?
What's an outcome?
Is this extra grading?
I don't want to use portfolios.
I don't use e-writing platform. I like to hold the paper. I like to grade in bed. I don't like compclass.
Administrators
Will reflective essays yield authentic prose?
Will my teachers suspect the panopticon?
1 comment:
Ron and I would love to hear your opinions, positive or negative. Please feel free to contact us at either cummings_robert1@colstate.edu and/or rlbaltha@uga.edu
Post a Comment